a face in the crowd

a face in the crowd is a film every one should see.  it isn’t a fun movie.  it might feel long in places.  perhaps, for the standard movie-goer, it doesn’t hold up well to repeated viewings.   but it’s an important film.  and whether you like it or not, it leaves a grim impression on the viewer which you will probably never get totally free of.

it was the first film for andy griffith, who was just getting his career going.  he would hardly have the chance to play such a wild and dramaticly interesting character again, getting largely typecast as an honest, smart and patient southern man for most of his career.  this happens to be not far from the type of man he seems to have been, so good for him.

but his character here, a ne’er-do-well ruffian named lonesome rhodes, is a far cry from the rest of griffith’s body of work.  his dark portrayal is solidified by elia kazan’s hopscotching directorial style and wickedly ironic and irrelevant montage.

the film starts out as marcia jeffries (patricia neal) is doing a radio show for her uncle’s station.  her show is called ‘a face in the crowd’ and she gets the idea to go to the local jail and interview whoever she finds.

in the jail she comes across lonesome rhodes (andy griffith).  he’s a hungover tramp in for a brief stint and after a little arguing he agrees to sing a little song, since he has a guitar with him.  actually it’s more than arguing.  he only agrees to talk to marcia after the sheriff agrees to cut short his sentence.

so he sings a song which is soulful and bluesy.  he spouts some observations about people.  marcia leaves satisfied.

but people who hear the broadcast are taken with lonesome.  they mistake his simple and quite obvious observations about their lives as insight and actual caring.  some calls come in.  and so marcia finds lonesome and puts him on the radio for a regular show.

his show is a mix of songs and rants.  almost immediately lonesome gets a sense of the power inherent in having uncritical strangers listen to you.  he soon uses this power to get revenge after a slight and then to try to influence a local election.

soon the big city comes calling and they want to put lonesome rhodes on television.  he goes and meets with the network.

the sponsor is a pill called ‘vita-jex’ which seems like a snake oil type cure-all product for men that will give them energy, sharpness, and quite possibly, better erections.  lonesome himself helps with the marketing by coming up with a song and a strategy.  the commercial features bouncing, grateful women who are now so pleased with their men they can barely contain themselves.

lonesome soon achieves success on television.  he meets a behind-the-scenes politico who wants lonesome to consult on a friend’s presidential run.

he is a superstar and is on track to marry marcia, but soon betrays her by marrying an underage baton twirler (lee remick) as he starts his downward slide.

eventually lonesome rhodes gets too big for his own britches.  he goes to far.  he says too much.  he has a fall from grace.

that’s about as much as i want to say about the plot.  the script is sly and cynical, smart and relentless.  it was written by budd schulberg, who also wrote on the waterfront.

the film is social criticism of the best kind, and although it’s not very subtle, it’s extremely effective.

watching the movie now it’s very hard to not make parallels to people like rush limbaugh, sean hannity, glenn beck and bill o’reilly.  these men all seem to practice a similar, emotionally based trade of playing upon people’s feelings of fear and superiority to consolidate power and wealth.

it’s hard to ever take men like this seriously after seeing lonesome rhodes’ story.  are they just like him?  are they also brimming with contempt for the people they pander to?  are they only saying what they say to keep people riled up but also to keep them as thoughtless, uninformed consumers?  how much of them is just entertainment and how much is real?  can anyone in the media really be believed?

above is a segment from lonesome rhodes’ tv show which serves as a quasi-commercial for vita-jex.   notice how really little has changed in the tenor of the marketing of bullshit from 1957 till now.  people now, as then, are attracted to simple solutions which satisfy their emotions and sense of self worth and importance.    and what’s simpler than a pill to make everything better?

i challenge to you watch a commercial for viagra or cialis or even heart medication and not think of this ad for a long, long time.  maybe it’s me, but i cannot help but reference it when i see ads for almost anything.    i first saw this film when i was 10 or 11 and the impression it left on me has never diminished.   to this day i can never watch an ad and see it just for what it is.  i can’t take the pitch seriously and if i can’t laugh at part of it, i criticize it instead.

i have the same response to anyone in the media, whether it’s rachel maddow, jon stewart or the above mentioned right wingers.  with anything that someone in the media is trying to communicate i catch myself asking these questions:  who is saying this?  what does the person writing or saying this what me to think, and why?  how do they or anyone else benefit from me thinking that?  and the result is i can hardly take anything in the media seriously, either.

i credit this film with putting the seed of that idea in my head when i first saw it as a little kid.  now when i watch this film, it’s like having one of my favorite meals again.  i enjoy it.  i’m reminded why i like it.  it’s one of the greats.

below is a trailer for the film which i think is what played in the theaters.  i don’t think it does nearly enough to sell what this film actually is.  watching the trailer but knowing the film, i’m struck by how much even the marketing of films has changed.

if this film was to be released now, each and every turn in the scenario would be spelled out.  there’d be as little mystery to what this film really was as possible.  i don’t think i like this trailer below…but i still prefer it to how it would probably be edited together for the film’s trailer in the current media climate.

Share
Posted in blogging, celebrity, cinema, film, movie reviews, movies, photography, writing | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

shame – film review

shame is a slow and patient movie.  it’s an unsexy movie about sex.  it’s mostly a psychological film about physical connectedness.  it features a bold, naked (literally and figuratively) performance by michael fassbender, but in the end, i just didn’t think it was that interesting.

i saw this movie a couple months ago in the theater but didn’t publish about it.  i stopped doing that write-about-every-movie-i-see thing because i’ve been working a lot and i didn’t think anyone would care.  but i saved a draft about this film which i just deleted and here i am posting about it anyway.

shame tells the story of brandon, who has a good job and a nice apartment.  he’s a sex addict who is lucky to be attractive and seems to make good enough money to pay for sex when he wants, to sluff work when he wants and to go out and screw as he pleases.

then his sister comes to visit.  no real insight is given into the past so we must intuit, but she and he seem to have boundary issues.  they are both damaged.  she’s a singer, of sorts.  she’s a free spirit in ways, where he is more controlled.   their relationship and they themselves are tested and i won’t spoil any of the sad results.

the sister is played carey mulligan.  like fassbender, her performance is quite raw and daring.  i just didn’t buy or care about the relationship, in the end.  the performances and direction really can’t be faulted, though.

i think the main flaw here was the script, which is by the director.  it takes a bare-bones approach to a taboo kind of subject and i both admired the attempt but was bored by it.  i think i could have used a bit more insight at to the ‘why’ of things rather than just the ‘way’ of things.

the film is directed by steve mcqueen (no relation to the actor) who is very promising.  his only other feature so far is hunger, about bobby sands’ hunger strike in an irish prison.  it also stars michael fassbender and is a much more potent and interesting film than this.  still, i can’t wait to see what mcqueen does next.

Share
Posted in blogging, celebrity, cinema, film, movie reviews, movies, writing | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

i do not now nor will i ever drink dr. pepper

i haven’t really seen commercials for a long time.   since about 2001 i’ve downloaded most everything i’ve ever watched.  or i used tivo.  so at best i’d fast forward through commercials.

but even shows i could watch on cable with commercials, like breaking bad or mad men, i’d download rather than dvr because i didn’t have to see the ads.

i feel oddball on this because i don’t have a lot of exposure to commercials.   people often say ‘have you seen that commercial….” and i have to shut them down by saying ‘no’ or worse, i have to hear them recount the thing.  the place i get screwed is at the movies.  there you are a hostage if there’s a commercial.

anyways – commercials are what they are.  and what can you do.

i stream the daily show and the colbert report on the comedy central website because it’s faster than waiting for the shows to pop up on piratebay.  here technology screws me.  here, like at the movie theater, i’m mostly forced to watch the commercial.

there’s this dr pepper commercial that they run right now that i absolutely hate.

it’s a hum-drum commuter day and this goofy, whiny song plays.  a guy strips off his suit (the outfit of a slave working in the service of other people’s dreams, i guess) to show he’s wearing a purple tshirt that says ‘i’m one of a kind’.

a small revolution takes place wherein everyone strips to reveal that they too are secretly wearing tshirts, each one with a hip, cool slogan on them.

there’s a hot girl in a white shirt which says ‘i’m a rebel’ – although the rebel hottie is still slave to the wear-a-tshirt-with-a-slogan paradigm, apparently.

let me rant and talk about why this ad hits at everything that is wrong with consumerism in this digital age:

1 – burgers or pizza is not freedom.  that is to say, variety is not freedom of choice.  customization isn’t self expression, it’s walking death.  it’s buying into the business-based lifestyle lie that you express yourself by the shit you buy

2 – everyone in this t-shirt revolution are all dressed the same.  am i missing something?  they all start out as individuals, all different to degrees of propriety and personality as people naturally are.  but then, as they ‘gotta be me’ they strip down to reveal that they are all the same, save for a slogan.  they all love dr pepper, that’s how they know they are free.

3 – in this socially networked, twitter snipped thought-pattern society, each person is reduced to expressing themselves not just in 140 characters, but in some cute way that fits on a tshirt.  i was reminded of the line that the cop yells at the serial killer at the end of the movie seven, directed by david fincher:  “you’re a fucking t-shirt, at best”

i was going to end this by asking ‘what would your tshirt read?’ but now that i think of it, nobody stupid enough to think to express themselves that way would be curious enough to be reading my blog.

below is the ridiculous ad.

i wonder what mr pibb is up to these days?

Share
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

bric shithouse

what is bric?  it refers to the countries with emerging economies that are quickly becoming the big players on the economic horizon.   specifically they are brazil, russia, india and china.

these countries recently had their fourth summit in new delhi.

why does this matter?

it matters to us here in the west because they are trying to get away from using the euro/dollar standard of value and trade.  there are many in the bric contingency who want to use local currencies to finance bilateral trade.  instead of trading via euros and dollars they want to use their own currencies – and they are powerful enough traders to do it.

they’ve been under pressure by the world community to use IMF (international monetary fund) money to finance their growth, and to lean on the resources of the world bank.  they have been resistant.  at this latest summit, the idea of forming a ‘bric development bank’ was floated.  basically this means that they don’t want to rely on western support in any way.  they want to shut us out.

these countries are growing stronger economically than ever before.  and their GDP’s (gross domestic product) are not a hocus-pocus, derivative-based model like our western economies.  theirs are based on producing tangible products.

they seek to be free of the hegemony of the dollar, to overthrow the bretton woods financial system and institute their own means of valuation and currency.  the result for us, however, will mean a weaker dollar and very likely a lowering of everyone’s standard of living.   but, maybe we don’t deserve what we already have.  in the past, our success has largely arisen out of our imperialistic economic approach.  the world doesn’t seem to believe in our solvency anymore.  these nations are seeking out new avenues of economy, to the detriment of ours.

the bric countries are doing the smart thing:  combining their resources so that they can better dictate the terms of business in this new age. the fact that they may want to separate themselves from the euro/dollar economic systems is just an unfortunate indicator of the decline of the west.

the bric countries and the western economic leaders all seem to want one thing:  globalism.  super-country factions like bric, as well as ‘the next eleven’ (korea, mexico, indonesia, turkey, egypt, nigeria, bangladesh, pakistan, iran, the philippines and vietnam), and others are merely shoring up their resources to ensure they all get a voice in whatever is coming. who could blame them?

there are those among us who seem to think the ‘free market’ is as immutable as the word of god.  whatever the market dictates simply …. ought to be, and cannnot be bad.  but as we saw in the late 90s with the ‘asian contagion’, the free market and the financial system we’ve designed is prone to fault and even self destruction.  it can get sick.  it could even die.  think of that.

so are the bric countries and their new alliance a threat to us or even themselves?   will they merely look out for themselves simply to maximize growth and profits?  what will happen when/if they no longer need us as trading partners?  what will our economy be based on, then?   it is partially their faith that sustains us, even as they turn slightly away from us.

what will happen?

Share
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

the trailer park boys – my favorite scene

7 seasons and two (sort of) movies in, here’s my favorite scene from the trailer park boys.  i won’t explain any of it.

Share
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

i went to #slcnerd

i guess this was the first slcnerd event.  it’s very promising.  it was in one large room at the complex in downtown salt lake city.   the stage was lit for the music and entertainment which came later.  nerd was in the air.

there were tables set up and some guys played role playing games, about which i know nothing.  i wandered from table to table listening in.  not knowing the ins and outs and hearing things out of context, some of it was downright hilarious.  but i’m sure in context and inside the games it was all serious business.

lots of local ‘nerd’ outlets were represented.  comic book stores, various podcasts, some artists and my personal favorites, the black monday society – who are guys who dress up like superheroes and purport to actually fight crime.  i wrote a review of a documentary about these types of guys not too long ago.

there were people dressed up in costume.    some guy who was 7 feet tall was chewbaca.  it wouldn’t be an event without that.  another guy was ironman.   there was a sexy catwoman wandering about.  there was a wonder woman who was adorable.  you get the idea.

i think my favorite part of the day was the larping display.  larp stands for live action role play.  they dress up, created a universe of rules and then ….. fight.  it was fun to see a girl dressed as some kind of wench heal herself while wielding a plastic sword.

the rules of larping get insanely precise.  you have to say certain things at certain times.  there’s a whole universe of powers, vulnerabilities and rules.  and the rules felt like they changed as the playing went on.

my favorite quote of the day was something like ‘what i forgot to tell you was that he is also a day vampire, but unfortunately, his opponent is also a necromancer’.  jesus….  but what fun!

slcnerd was a small event with a lot of promise.  there are some bugs to work out, some tightening maybe to do.   there was a good lineup of live entertainment at the end, but i only stayed for parts of the first two acts to perform.

i think if they can keep putting this event on, it will grow to be something amazing and totally fun – even if you aren’t a nerd.

i’m not a nerd and it was a blast.

pics i took at the event will be here when i get around to it.  that is to say, this text will become a hyperlink.  it will be blue.  is this blue?  if not, i haven’t done them yet.  however, if this text is blue, feel free to click.

below is an ever-s0-brief video i made on my iphone of some of the larping.

Share
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

color full – a blog about holi, the festival of colors

this past weekend was the 2 day holi – festival of colors.   in utah it is held at the sri radha temple in spanish fork, utah, which is a very cool looking structure that i’ve photographed before.

here it’s put on by some hare krishnas, who are hindu.  the festival is a celebration of spring, at it’s heart.  it is celebrated mainly by coming together, throwing colored, starchy powders on each other.  it’s fun, which is why it is growing ever larger, especially here in utah.

there was some great live music, which mostly seems repetitive and largely seems to be composed just of the words ‘hare’ and ‘krishna’, but this is not to say that i didn’t enjoy it.  mostly it was just a backdrop for the proceedings.

it was 2 bucks to get in.  but they also sold food and the colored powders.  they have a nice package deal.  even though it’s not a ‘free’ thing, it doesn’t feel like a money deal for the church.  utah is a mostly mormon state, and few in attendance were hindus, nor would they ever consider becoming hindu.

this isn’t the point of the festival.

i took pictures from the start.  i parked about two miles away on the main highway.  i could have parked much closer but i wanted to walk and mingle on the way.  walking there, with a bunch of younger, mormon-looking kids about i felt like a true pilgrim on a religious journey.  maybe i was setting myself up for what would come later.

i took pictures of the kids who were around me.  everyone seemed happy and light.  there was excited chatter about how cool it all was.

inside the proceedings i wandered about the whole place in two rotations, snapping pictures as the first color throwing began.  then i laid down in the grass by the stage and watched some people dancing and goofing off.  i became downright emotional.

i was struck at how all these people, of different backgrounds, beliefs and class came together in this joyous but senseless way.  was it senseless?

the colors and the throwing of them became somehow significant to me, although before going i had assumed it was just a fun diversion.

where ever you mingle at holi, people randomly spritz you with power.  but people were kind about it, and friendly.  i could tell that when people saw me holding my camera they took care to not douse my camera with the powder.  i had wrapped it carefully in a bag but i probably needn’t have bothered.

the colors became a living metaphor to me.  the affect we all have on each other, how we interact, the tracks of it was visible in the form of the color.  we are all the same, though we think we are different sometimes.  we have these preferences which we think define us, but which i know merely serve to separate us.  and yet, we are all unique.

i don’t think i believe in god as hindus and most religions subscribe to, but i also do think there is some kind of connective tissue that binds the manifold reality of existence.  maybe i talked myself into it but it felt tangible at the event.

indeed, there in the grass i felt like we were all one consciousness.  the auto-hypnotic, chanting music probably helped this feeling along, but still i think it was genuine.

i wondered how many others around me were feeling this same welling inside them, this same idea.   i know many came just for the novelty and the party, but there was such a positive vibe of one-ness i felt from so many i looked at that surely for some folks it ran deeper than just a wild way to spend a saturday.

some people left their colors on them all day, others were washing it off at their cars.  back in salt lake i saw people here and there with color in their hair and on their shirts and even faces.

i wondered if it was just a fun status symbol for them.   a kind of ‘yeah, i went there today’ or if it meant something deeper to them.  i hope they got something deeper out of it, because it was truly remarkable.

pictures that i took there are on my photoblog if you want to bother.

below is a short video i made, also.

Share
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

hunger games – movie review

i won’t say i was ‘dragged’ to the hunger games, but anyone who knows me would probably be surprised to hear that i went to see it.

what was nice about going to see it was that i was exposed to almost none of the hype surrounding it.

i don’t watch news.  i mostly consume news via my twitter feed through about 400 international outlets.  on twitter i almost exclusively follow only news outlets throughout the world.  so the tidbits about the hunger games that i saw were related merely to headlines which, due to the nature of them, i would never click on.  the point of saying all this is:  i went into the hunger games almost totally blind and wholly ignorant.

what did i think of it? i thought the premise was immediately stupid.  every year a reality show of sorts is held in which young people have to fight to the death?   this is done to maintain peace and order?

meh.  but i went along.

the premise of the hunger games is a strange mix of aztec sacrifice, standard gladiator fare, the truman show and the holocaust.   that sounds like a lot.  really it amounts to very little.

the movie stars jennifer lawrence, who distinguished herself early on in winter’s bone, a film which also featured the great john hawkes.

there were ideas behind the film that intrigued me.  i was struck by the idea that, during a holocaust-type roundup, the youth wouldn’t revolt.    there was a certain level of societal self-satisfaction among the television viewers of the games inside the movie which bordered on satire that i found interesting.   the one-dimensional parody of reality television wasn’t lost on me, but it mostly fell flat.

watching this film, i was surrounded by young teens, much as i was when i screened the last twilight movie.  i was struck by the fact that every couple of years we are hit with another ‘phenomenon’ like this – a literary phenomenon turned cinematic.

this is true whether it’s harry potter, the lord of the rings, or twilight.  the success of these and the hunger games means just more of the same will inevitably follow.  but i was taken with the idea while watching it that none of this is pure literature.  none of it is transformative.  it is none of it the catcher in the rye.  it is none of it anything approaching kurt vonnegut or hermann hesse.  it’s just …. stories, soap opera.

it’s all just fun, entertaining storytelling based on age old paradigms, made fresh for a young, cynical audience.    it’s the retelling of old memes – whether it’s vampires, magic or gladiators.

so is the hunger games a good movie? nah.  not by a long shot.  it’s simple and the action is told in an almost paint-by-the-numbers fashion.  is it a compelling story?  not really, though jennifer lawrence does a good job selling the idea as the lead.

to use an increasingly tired phrase – it is what is is.  and that’s all that is is.

but i’m sure it totally hits it’s intended target.  i just wonder what might happen if someone would design a challenging, meaningful entertainment that spurred in it’s intended demographic not just the perception of being entertained and distracted but additionally inspired the reality of thinking something new and all their own?

now that would be something.

Share
Posted in blogging, celebrity, cinema, film, movie reviews, movies, photography, rants, Uncategorized, writing | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

adam carolla says “fuck buick”, “fuck nbc”, and “fuck celebrity apprentice”

i’ve listened to adam carolla since he replaced howard stern in certain radio markets back in the terrestrial radio days, which even now already sounds old fashioned.  i had never watched the man show until after this point, and have really only checked it out as a reference based on stuff he talks about on-air.

when he was on dancing with the stars, i tuned in until he was booted, after his unicycle dance routine.

he’s a comic persona, a carpenter and kind of a right wing guy.  i find his rants repetitive and his personality grating, but i have nonetheless listened to every hour of his broadcasts since his first KLSX days and will probably get around to listening to all of his lovelines stuff (which i have downloaded from giovanni) eventually.

adam carolla had a huge contract with cbs radio when they decided to fold up radio operations.  as it was, he was paid for nearly a year without having to do a radio show.  what he did instead was to do a daily podcast and literally ‘steal’ his daily audience away from the moronic network that axed him and those like him in favor of bullshit, programmed radio.

and, three years in we find that right now he’s on celebrity apprentice, with donald trump.

that he would be picked for this show seems a strange choice, because he has mocked trump openly for years.

but nonetheless – he was asked and he took the job.  i have not watched the episodes yet.

he is on the celebrity apprentice show with penn jillette.  penn is antother guy i’ve paid a lot of attention to in life.  i’ve always admired his deconstructive magic style with his partner teller, and i’ve listened to every hour of penn’s broadcasts as well (he used to do a podcast).

well – the other day on adam’s podcast, penn called in to talk about what had happened to them while filming celebrity apprentice.

in the episode, adam details not just how the nbc producers ‘cooked’ the show, edited it and presented it to look like such-and-such happened, but he and penn both went into detail about what actually went down.

apparently, adam’s agent, james ‘baby doll’ dixon, who also manages jon stewart and stephen colbert, got the call from nbc that adam had crossed the line.

this is where/why i love adam and the podcasting world in general.

adam came online the next day and said:

i’m just telling the truth …. we live in a town that is really weird … if you work on a movie, for three months with jeremy piven and he was a total douchebag and someone asks you ‘what was it like’ …. and you go ‘he was a douchebag’ everybody says ‘why you hatin’….  celebrity apprentice … they were trying to cook the show, they gave me erroneous information from the producers…. and i’m just explaining the situation

i don’t give a shit….  look … fuck nbc…. fuck buick (the company involved in the celebrity apprentice challenge) ….. fuck celebrity apprentice….. doesn’t matter

i don’t give a fuck about nbc, i don’t give a fuck if they are pissed off at me….

here’s the thing – i like the people from celebrity apprentice…. but i don’t give a shit because i’ve got YOU GUYS (referring to the podcast audience)

i like this attitude because, besides it expressing a truth about a needlessly corrupt and dishonest industry, it hints at the true nature of independent media.  adam is free to speak what he thinks because over the course of the last few years he has cultivated an audience and an income stream that allows him to be him, totally

even when he is stupidly wrong, or silly.  just like rush limbaugh.

i think adam is funny and worthwhile.  i will always listen to him, unless he goes batshit crazy in some way, whereas i’d never listen to limbaugh.

the point is, adam carolla, in the position he has crafted for himself, has nothing to lose by telling the absolute and total truth.  and it’s nice to hear as i go about my day.

i agree.  fuck nbc.  fuck buick.  fuck celebrity apprentice.  fuck adam carolla, even.  but not just yet…

Share
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

hate crimes

‘hate crimes’ are, in essence, thought crimes.

they are anathema to freedom. what’s in someone’s head when they commit a crime is immaterial (except in aiding the establishment of the fact of the crime itself).

‘hate crime’ legislation is emotionally based nonsense. laws exist to maintain social order, not to aid in boosting societal self esteem.

over time, accepting the ‘hate crime’ approach to societal change will lead, like so many ill conceived, half-assed social remedies, to diminished freedom

Share
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment